Discussing “Medieval” China
Author: Bret Windhauser
Objective of the activity
Pre-class activities
In-class activities
Discuss the article assigned for homework about Feudalism in China. Tianyu argues that the notion that China was a “feudal society” from 221 BCE to 1912 CE has historically been used to justify European imperialism and global supremacy by suggesting that China was “stuck” in a feudal stage of development. Tianyu then posits that China transitioned away from feudalism, at least in a European sense, in the late antique era. Class discussion on how Tianyu’s argument fits within Marxist and Ibn Khaldunian notions of temporal change. Transition: If we understand that terms like Medieval are associated mainly with European history and one of the defining elements of Medieval Europe is feudalism, how can we characterize/ periodize this period (roughly 800 – 1300) in Chinese history? Many Chinese historians discuss this not as “Medieval” China but a golden age of artistic and technological innovation. Short presentation on the Song Dynasty and technological innovations that developed under the dynasty. Introduce the Along the River During the Qingming Festival scroll painted by Zhang Zeduan. Activity Separate the students into groups. Have them go to the website below, which has high-quality scans of the Qingming Festival Scroll. The website has the original scroll and multiple later copies. Students should scroll down to the part of the website that says “Original Scroll”. When they click on it, the full scroll will be accessible. Encourage the students to scroll through the images on their own devices for a minute before discussing the questions on the handout (see attachment). This should take about 15-20 minutes for the students to discuss. If a group finishes early, have them scroll down to the “Qing Court Version” and have them repeat the activity to identify any differences. At a point when two groups are done, have them debate their findings with each other. The students often focus on different parts of the scroll which have slightly different answers. The instructor during the activity should circulate and encourage participation, especially for students who tend to be quieter in class. If needed, speak to those students one-on-one to understand their opinions on the scroll.
After Class Activities
Homework: Read Marco Polo’s description of the city of Hangchow (modern Hangzhou, China) called “Description of the Great City of Kinsay (Hangchow) Which Is the Capital of the Whole Country of Manzi (South China)” through the link below. Write a short reflection, around one page double-spaced, comparing and contrasting Polo’s description of Hangchow with Lourenco Pinto’s description of Ubini in Igodomigodo (modern Benin City, Nigeria) which we discussed previously. What can we learn about these Europeans’ reflections on major non-European cities? -See attachment for full assignment The assessment is important for understanding how the students engage with material across centuries and continents in a comparative way. Much of the course, as a history survey, intends to build skills for analyzing such primary sources in conversation with one another. This assessment is graded for participation with feedback provided on Brightspace.
Resources
i3v6Vxbm7GAM-Reinterpreting-Chinas-Feudal-Soceity.pdf, 8f5abWxQWqG2-Windhauser_The-Fengjian-System-Assignment.pdf, xmazH7OfgK4N-Windhauser_In-class-Qingming-Scroll-Worksheet.pdf
IMzYG3PWe6fC-Windhauser_Medieval-China-Presentation.pdf, s1qMmJ1LfqTd-Windhauser_Polo-and-Pinto-Primary-Source-Analysis.pdf, BFppC31WOOas-Windhauser_CACI-Lesson-Plan-Medieval-China.pdf
0 Comments